What is a Software Requirements Specification (SRS) Document?

A new system has three main stakeholders: the client, the development team, and the end users. The requirements for the system that will meet the client's needs and the users' concerns must be clearly expressed to the development team. The problem is that the client typically might not comprehend the product or the development process, and the developer frequently does not understand the client's problems or application area. This creates a communication gap between the development team and the stakeholders. This is where the SRS document comes into play. A Software Requirements Specification document is a comprehensive and structured description outlining a software system's functional and non-functional requirements, constraints, and specifications.

Why is a Software Requirements Specification needed?

The Software Requirements Specification document is intended to bridge the communication gap between the development and provide a shared vision of the program being produced.

Hence, one of the key benefits of a good SRS is that it serves as the foundation for the client and supplier's agreement on the software product's functionality. This basis for agreement is frequently established as a legal contract between the client and the developer.

So, the client can clearly express their requirements using SRS, while the developer can grasp the functionalities to include in the product.

A significant advantage is that an SRS is a reference for validating the final output. The SRS helps the client assess if the program fits the requirements.

Perils of Having a Bad SRS Document

Without a correct SRS, a customer cannot tell whether the product being given is exactly what was intended, and there is no way the developer can convince the client that all of the requirements have been met. The base of agreement and validation must be solid enough reasons for both the client and the developer to undertake a comprehensive and rigorous job of comprehending and specifying requirements, but there are other practical and compelling reasons to have a good SRS.

Studies demonstrate that many errors are made during the requirements phase. An inaccuracy in the SRS will show up as an error in the final system. If we want a high-quality final output that contains few errors, we must start with a high-quality SRS.

Finally, the quality of the SRS affects the project's cost (and timeline). We understand that errors sometimes occur in the SRS. It's also understood that the expense of fixing an error grows almost exponentially over time. Hence, by strengthening the quality of requirements, we may make significant savings in the future by having less costly defect removals.

Modelling VS SRS document:

As analysis precedes specification, the first question that arises is: If formal modelling is done during analysis, why are the outputs of modelling not treated as an SRS?

The main reason is that modelling generally focuses on the problem structure, not its external behaviour. Consequently, things like user interfaces are rarely modelled, whereas they frequently form a major component of the SRS.

Similarly, performance constraints, design constraints, standards compliance, recovery, etc., are not included in the model, but must be specified clearly in the SRS because the designer must know about these to properly design the system. It should, therefore, be clear that the outputs of a model cannot form a desirable SRS. The transition from analysis to the specification should also not be expected to be straightforward, even if some formal modelling is used during analysis.

A good SRS needs to specify many things, some of which are not satisfactorily handled during analysis.

Points to be considered in a SRS:

Issues such as incomplete scenario descriptions and omission of elements like standards compliance, recovery mechanisms, performance limitations, and design constraints are common in modelling, necessitating explicit articulation in a Software Requirements Specification (SRS) to guide effective system design. While formal modelling may aid analysis, the transition from analysis to specification is inherently complex. Numerous factors crucial for a comprehensive SRS are not adequately addressed through analysis alone. Knowledge acquired during system analysis is the foundation for preparing the SRS, wherein the challenging task of translating information into a structured text is undertaken. The requirement process encompasses problem or requirement analysis, formulation, and validation, culminating in the creation of a high-quality SRS document.

Problem analysis often begins with a comprehensive "problem statement," where the analyst models the problem domain and environment to grasp the system's behaviour, constraints, inputs, and outputs. This essential activity aims to thoroughly understand the software's capabilities. The analysis involves multiple meetings with customers and end-users, where they present their work, environment, and requirements. Any relevant documents about the organization can be submitted with existing methods for the task. In the initial meetings, the analyst primarily listens, absorbing provided information. As understanding grows, subsequent meetings involve discussions to clarify uncertainties, document information, create models, and brainstorm ideas about the system's functionality. In the concluding meetings, the analyst articulates their vision for the system, aligning it with the client's needs and explaining the proposed approach.

Thank you for reading this article. Please consider subscribing if you loved the article.